{"id":19447,"date":"2024-02-26T11:36:17","date_gmt":"2024-02-26T11:36:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/?p=19447"},"modified":"2026-10-05T16:10:52","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T16:10:52","slug":"check-backlinks-in-google-analytics-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/check-backlinks-in-google-analytics-4\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Check Backlinks in Google Analytics 4"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You can check which websites send you backlink traffic in Google Analytics 4 by opening <strong>Reports &gt; Acquisition &gt; Traffic acquisition<\/strong>, filtering for <strong>Referral<\/strong>, and changing the table dimension to <strong>Session source \/ medium<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>That gives you a useful starting list of referring sources. A complete backlink inventory needs a different approach. A link can exist for months without generating a visit that GA4 measures.<\/p>\n<p>In this guide, I&#8217;ll show you how to find those sources, see where visitors land, investigate the referring URL, and compare your findings with Google Search Console. I&#8217;ll also explain what I would check before calling a referral valuable, broken, or suspicious.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"key-takeaways\">Key takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>GA4 helps you evaluate measured visits associated with external links. Its rows and session counts are not backlink counts.<\/li>\n<li>Use session-scoped acquisition dimensions for this review. First user source answers a different question.<\/li>\n<li>Page referrer can help investigate the previous page, but browsers may provide only its origin or no referrer.<\/li>\n<li>Search Console&#8217;s Links report provides a sample of discovered links, including links that may send no measured traffic.<\/li>\n<li>A low engagement rate does not establish that a backlink harms your rankings. Unwanted-referral settings change attribution; they do not remove links from the web.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"what-does-google-analytics-actually-show-about-backlinks\">What does Google Analytics actually show about backlinks?<\/h2>\n<p>I separate this task into two questions: \u201cWhere has someone linked to my site?\u201d and \u201cWhat happened when people visited?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>GA4 is useful for the second question. You can investigate the recorded acquisition source, engagement, and actions visitors completed. Google describes the <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/12923437?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">Traffic acquisition report<\/a> as a report about where new and returning visitors come from.<\/p>\n<p>For the first question, use Search Console or a dedicated backlink crawler, then verify important links on the linking page. Each source has coverage and timing limits. There is no reason to expect its link count to match your GA4 sessions.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/backlink-traffic-model.webp\" alt=\"Two independent paths: crawlers discover a sample of links, while GA4 measures visits, sources, engagement and key events\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"\"><figcaption>Original conceptual illustration. Link discovery and visit measurement answer different questions. This is not account data or a product screenshot.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>For example, one link could produce many visits, while another produces none during your chosen month. A referral from a private workspace might send visitors even though a public crawler cannot inspect that workspace. These are reasons to compare evidence rather than force the numbers to agree.<\/p>\n<p>If you want to audit the links themselves, start with our broader guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/how-to-check-backlinks\/\">checking backlinks<\/a>, then use this GA4 workflow to evaluate traffic.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-you-need-before-opening-the-report\">What you need before opening the report<\/h2>\n<p>Choose the correct GA4 property using the account and property selector. It is in the <strong>top-left<\/strong> area of the interface, as shown in Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/9367631?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">navigation guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Your website must already have working measurement for the dates you want to review. Opening an acquisition report will not reconstruct visits that were never collected.<\/p>\n<p>You also need access to the property. Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/9305587?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">role documentation<\/a> says Viewers can read reports, change the displayed dimensions, and create their own explorations. Sharing an exploration or changing property settings can require a higher role. Revenue restrictions can also affect what you see.<\/p>\n<p>I would begin with the last complete month. For a quiet site, a longer period can make patterns easier to assess. Keep the period written down, especially when comparing sources. A burst after a mention and a quiet following week can both be perfectly ordinary.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-to-check-backlink-traffic-in-google-analytics-4\">How to check backlink traffic in Google Analytics 4<\/h2>\n<h3 id=\"1-open-traffic-acquisition\">1. Open Traffic acquisition<\/h3>\n<p>Go to <strong>Reports &gt; Acquisition &gt; Traffic acquisition<\/strong>. If your property&#8217;s navigation has been customized, search for the report in Analytics. An Editor or Administrator may need to restore it to the navigation.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"2-filter-for-the-referral-channel\">2. Filter for the Referral channel<\/h3>\n<p>Click <strong>Add filter<\/strong>. Choose an include filter for <strong>Session default channel group<\/strong>, set the match to <strong>exactly matches<\/strong>, and select <strong>Referral<\/strong>. Apply the filter.<\/p>\n<p>This keeps your selection explicit. Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/11377859?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">guide to report filters<\/a> explains how the dimension, match type, and selected values control the displayed data.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"3-show-the-referring-sources\">3. Show the referring sources<\/h3>\n<p>Use the dropdown above the first table column to choose <strong>Session source \/ medium<\/strong>. You might see a value such as <strong>example.com \/ referral<\/strong>. This is an illustrative value, not a result from a tested account.<\/p>\n<p>A quick alternative is to select Session source \/ medium and search the table for \u201creferral.\u201d For a repeatable review, I prefer an explicit filter because a text search matches displayed text rather than expressing the exact channel rule.<\/p>\n<p>Check the filter and date range before exporting or taking a screenshot. Label the result \u201creferral traffic by source,\u201d so someone reading it later does not mistake the rows for individual backlinks.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ga4-source-controls-direct.jpg\" alt=\"Google&#039;s published GA4 table example showing the Session source \/ medium dropdown and table search\" width=\"207\" height=\"59\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"\"><figcaption>Genuine controls excerpt from Google&#8217;s Traffic acquisition Help image. The example shows google \/ organic, not referral results. Retrieved October 5, 2026; the source does not state the original capture date.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 id=\"4-understand-the-channel-and-medium-difference\">4. Understand the channel and medium difference<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Referral<\/strong> is a channel label. The lowercase <strong>referral<\/strong> is a medium value. Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/9756891?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">default channel definitions<\/a> include referral, app, and link among the medium values for the Referral channel.<\/p>\n<p>If you specifically want sessions with the referral medium, filter <strong>Session medium exactly matches referral<\/strong> instead. Record which method you used; the two selections can produce different totals.<\/p>\n<p>External links can also produce traffic classified as Organic Social, Email, Affiliates, or other channels. Google&#8217;s current definitions include <strong>AI Assistant<\/strong> too. A Referral-only report therefore leaves out other kinds of external-link traffic. Check the source and channel in your own date range before assuming where an AI or social visit belongs.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"why-i-use-session-source-instead-of-first-user-source\">Why I use Session source instead of First user source<\/h2>\n<p>Imagine someone first discovers your website through Google Search. A week later, they return by clicking a partner&#8217;s article in a new session. You are now asking about that later visit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session source \/ medium<\/strong> is the appropriate acquisition view for sessions in your selected period. <strong>First user source \/ medium<\/strong> describes how the user was first acquired. Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/11080067?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">traffic-source scope guide<\/a> explains this distinction.<\/p>\n<p>There is another nuance: a session source is an attribution value, not a click-by-click log. Google says a new campaign or source encountered during an existing session does <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/11242841?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">not automatically start a new session<\/a>. Avoid treating every row as proof of one fresh external click.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"find-the-pages-your-referral-visitors-land-on\">Find the pages your referral visitors land on<\/h2>\n<p>Once I have a useful referring source, my next question is where those visitors arrive. A source sending people to an outdated product page needs a different response from one sending readers to a helpful tutorial.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Keep your acquisition filter applied.<\/li>\n<li>Keep <strong>Session source \/ medium<\/strong> as the primary dimension.<\/li>\n<li>Click the <strong>+<\/strong> beside that dimension.<\/li>\n<li>Add <strong>Landing page + query string<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Google also documents the reverse method: open the <strong>Landing page<\/strong> report and add Session source \/ medium as the secondary dimension. The <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/12931766?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">Landing page documentation<\/a> confirms both arrangements.<\/p>\n<p>This helps you connect a source with a session&#8217;s first measured pageview. It does not necessarily reveal the original URL in the external link, because a redirect may have happened before the measured page loaded.<\/p>\n<p>Keep an eye on query strings that split the same useful page into several rows. Also, Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/10917952?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">UTM documentation<\/a> notes that UTM parameters are omitted from Landing page + query string and Page path + query string. Use the campaign dimensions to analyze those tags.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"can-you-see-the-exact-referring-url-in-ga4\">Can you see the exact referring URL in GA4?<\/h2>\n<p>Sometimes. The <strong>Page referrer<\/strong> dimension holds the previous URL reported with an event. It can contain your own pages as well as external pages, so it needs careful filtering.<\/p>\n<p>Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/analytics\/devguides\/collection\/ga4\/reference\/config#page_referrer\" target=\"_blank\">tag configuration reference<\/a> says the page_referrer value defaults to document.referrer. That value cannot reveal a path the browser did not send.<\/p>\n<p>For example, a visit from https:\/\/example.com\/resources\/article may expose only https:\/\/example.com\/. Under the browser default <a href=\"https:\/\/developer.mozilla.org\/en-US\/docs\/Web\/Security\/Practical_implementation_guides\/Referrer_policy\" target=\"_blank\">strict-origin-when-cross-origin policy<\/a>, cross-origin requests share the origin rather than the full path. A no-referrer policy can omit it altogether.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"build-a-focused-page-referrer-exploration\">Build a focused Page referrer exploration<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>Open <strong>Explore<\/strong> and create a <strong>Free form<\/strong> exploration with a table.<\/li>\n<li>Import <strong>Page referrer<\/strong>, <strong>Page location<\/strong>, and <strong>Event name<\/strong> as dimensions.<\/li>\n<li>Import <strong>Event count<\/strong> as a metric.<\/li>\n<li>Add Page referrer and Page location to <strong>Rows<\/strong>, and Event count to <strong>Values<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Add a filter for <strong>Event name exactly matches page_view<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>For a known source, filter Page referrer to that exact observed origin or URL. Otherwise review the values and exclude your own hostnames and empty values.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This is an investigation of recorded pageview events. Its Event count is neither a unique-link count nor a session total. Start with one known source so you can check whether the rows answer your question before broadening the report.<\/p>\n<p>Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/9327972?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">Free-form guide<\/a> explains rows, values, and filters. If your combination is unavailable or incompatible, remove optional fields and check the configuration rather than swapping in a differently scoped metric without noticing.<\/p>\n<p>If you want to restrict this investigation to Referral-classified sessions, add the session channel dimension and its filter where compatible. Leave that filter off when your purpose is to investigate external referrers across other channels too.<\/p>\n<p>When only a domain appears, I would use Search Console or a backlink index to locate candidate pages. I would not invent the missing path or label a domain as the exact linking article.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-to-judge-the-traffic-a-referring-source-sends\">How to judge the traffic a referring source sends<\/h2>\n<p>After finding the source and destination, look at what visitors did. I would ask these questions in order:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Was there enough activity to compare?<\/strong> A percentage based on two sessions can swing dramatically.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Did visitors engage?<\/strong> Review engaged sessions and engagement rate, alongside the page&#8217;s purpose.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Did the intended action happen?<\/strong> Select a relevant key event, such as a properly measured lead submission.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Is the measurement reliable?<\/strong> Confirm the event definition and check whether revenue is implemented and visible to your role.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Google defines <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/12195621?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">engagement rate<\/a> as the share of sessions that qualify as engaged. This is useful behavior evidence. It is not a score of the referring website&#8217;s SEO authority.<\/p>\n<p>Suppose two sources send 80 and 12 sessions. The smaller source could still deserve attention if it reaches the right audience and produces useful enquiries. That is an illustrative decision, not a benchmark or a guarantee that the link influences rankings.<\/p>\n<p>Keep the business question specific: \u201cShould I improve this landing page?\u201d is easier to answer than \u201cIs this backlink good?\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"cross-check-discovered-links-in-google-search-console\">Cross-check discovered links in Google Search Console<\/h2>\n<p>Open Search Console for the relevant property and choose <strong>Links<\/strong>. Under External links, review <strong>Top linking sites<\/strong>, <strong>Top linked pages<\/strong>, and <strong>Top linking text<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>To investigate a specific link, open a target page and then a linking site to inspect the linking pages Google reports. Revisit important source pages before concluding that their links are still present.<\/p>\n<p>Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/webmasters\/answer\/9049606\" target=\"_blank\">Links report documentation<\/a> says this is a sample, may include links found in the past, and groups sites by root domain. Tables can be limited to 1,000 rows; the main report&#8217;s link exports support up to 100,000 rows. It does not label links as nofollow.<\/p>\n<p>When comparing domains, remember that GA4 may retain a hostname or use a campaign source label while Search Console groups by root domain. Review these differences before matching rows.<\/p>\n<p>Here is how I would read a mismatch:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Found in both:<\/strong> investigate the discovered links and their measured traffic together.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Found only in Search Console:<\/strong> there may be no measured visits in your chosen period, or measurement or attribution may differ.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Found only in GA4:<\/strong> the source may be outside the link sample, private, campaign-tagged, or worth checking for measurement noise.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>You do not have to link the two products to use this workflow. The <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/10737381?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">Search Console integration<\/a> adds organic-search query and landing-page reports to GA4. It does not import the Links report. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/link-ga4-with-google-search\/\">GA4 and Search Console linking guide<\/a> covers that separate setup.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"why-a-known-backlink-might-not-appear-in-ga4\">Why a known backlink might not appear in GA4<\/h2>\n<p>An absent source deserves a check, not an immediate conclusion that the link disappeared.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>No recorded visit:<\/strong> nobody may have clicked during the selected period, or the destination did not send a usable measurement event.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Referrer limits:<\/strong> browser privacy, the linking page&#8217;s policy, or a noreferrer attribute can reduce or omit the referring information.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Different classification:<\/strong> campaign tagging or channel rules may put the visit under Email, Social, AI Assistant, or another source or medium.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Measurement and consent:<\/strong> tag coverage, consent implementation, and blocking can affect collection and the detail available. Their effects are not always equivalent to Direct traffic.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Report configuration:<\/strong> the wrong property, date, filter, or scope can hide the result you expected.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Data availability:<\/strong> retention, sampling, thresholds, and high-cardinality rows can limit an exploration.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Check the <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/12856703?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">data quality indicator<\/a> before interpreting a small difference. Also check <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/7667196?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">data retention<\/a>: it affects the event-level history available in explorations, while standard aggregated reports are treated differently. Increasing retention does not restore data already deleted.<\/p>\n<p>Be especially careful with link attributes. <strong>Nofollow<\/strong> concerns the relationship to the linked resource; <strong>noreferrer<\/strong> suppresses referrer information. They are <a href=\"https:\/\/html.spec.whatwg.org\/multipage\/links.html#link-type-noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">different HTML link types<\/a>. A nofollow link can still send measurable visits.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-to-do-about-spam-payment-providers-and-broken-destinations\">What to do about spam, payment providers, and broken destinations<\/h2>\n<h3 id=\"keep-attribution-changes-separate-from-a-link-audit\">Keep attribution changes separate from a link audit<\/h3>\n<p>Payment or account-service domains can appear during a customer&#8217;s journey. Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/analytics\/answer\/10327750?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">unwanted-referral feature<\/a> can stop matching referrers from being used as traffic sources. An Editor or Administrator should review the actual journey before changing it.<\/p>\n<p>The documented path is <strong>Admin &gt; Data streams &gt; your web stream &gt; Configure tag settings &gt; Show all &gt; List unwanted referrals<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>I would not add an unfamiliar domain simply because its engagement is low. This setting does not delete a backlink, disavow it, block visitors, or automatically erase historical data. Start with a report-level exclusion when you only want a cleaner view for an investigation.<\/p>\n<p>Do not casually open suspicious referral URLs. Inspect available context first and avoid downloads, sign-ins, or security-warning bypasses. A strange source label may be measurement spam rather than evidence of a real linking page.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"verify-a-suspected-broken-destination\">Verify a suspected broken destination<\/h3>\n<p>If your error pages are measured and have a recognizable title, a pageview exploration filtered to that title can help identify traffic reaching them. Include Page location and Page referrer so you can investigate the destination and available source together.<\/p>\n<p>A title containing \u201c404\u201d is only a clue. Check the actual URL and HTTP response before deciding what to fix. An error page with no measurement will not appear through this technique.<\/p>\n<p>For an important broken URL, restore the useful content or choose a genuinely relevant replacement. Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/crawling-indexing\/301-redirects\" target=\"_blank\">redirect guidance<\/a> explains permanent redirects. Avoid sending every missing URL to the homepage or promising that a redirect instantly restores search performance.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, GA4 cannot establish that a backlink requires disavowal. Google says <a href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/webmasters\/answer\/2648487?hl=en\" target=\"_blank\">most sites do not need its disavow tool<\/a>, and misuse can hurt search performance. That decision needs link evidence and the specific circumstances described in Google&#8217;s guidance.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"a-simple-review-you-can-repeat\">A simple review you can repeat<\/h2>\n<p>I would keep a short record for sources worth investigating: source and medium, date range, landing page, sessions, the relevant business outcome, discovered link evidence, and the next action.<\/p>\n<p>Use the same report scope and comparable periods each time. Note campaign launches, tracking changes, or a change in channel classification alongside the numbers. That makes a later drop easier to interpret.<\/p>\n<p>For partner campaigns you control, consistent UTM tagging can distinguish placements. Use a medium that describes the actual channel rather than tagging everything referral just to make it appear in this report. Do not put personal or confidential information in URL parameters.<\/p>\n<p>The useful result is a small set of concrete decisions: fix this destination, refresh this resource, review this tracking issue, or discuss another placement with this partner.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"frequently-asked-questions\">Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<h3 id=\"can-google-analytics-show-all-my-backlinks\">Can Google Analytics show all my backlinks?<\/h3>\n<p>No. GA4 reports measurement and attribution data. Links that generated no measured activity will not form a complete inventory there. Use Search Console and other link-discovery sources, keeping their coverage limits in mind.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"is-a-referral-source-the-same-as-a-backlink\">Is a referral source the same as a backlink?<\/h3>\n<p>A source is a reporting value. It may represent visits associated with one link, many links, a private resource, or campaign tagging. Verify the linking page before treating the source as a specific backlink.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"can-i-check-a-competitors-backlinks-in-ga4\">Can I check a competitor&#8217;s backlinks in GA4?<\/h3>\n<p>Only if you have authorized access to their GA4 property, and even then you would see measured traffic rather than a complete link inventory. For public competitor research, use a backlink index and inspect accessible source pages.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"why-does-page-referrer-show-only-a-domain\">Why does Page referrer show only a domain?<\/h3>\n<p>The browser or referring site&#8217;s policy may supply only the origin. An exploration cannot reconstruct a missing path. Use link-discovery evidence to investigate possible source pages.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"does-linking-search-console-to-ga4-add-a-backlinks-report\">Does linking Search Console to GA4 add a backlinks report?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The integration adds reports about organic search queries and landing-page traffic. Use the Links report inside Search Console separately.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"should-i-remove-a-backlink-with-no-conversions\">Should I remove a backlink with no conversions?<\/h3>\n<p>Not on that evidence alone. Review volume, audience fit, the landing page, your event setup, and the purpose of the link. GA4 behavior metrics do not prove a link is harming rankings.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"final-thoughts\">Final thoughts<\/h2>\n<p>Start with Traffic acquisition, make the Referral filter explicit, and use Session source \/ medium to find sources worth a closer look. Then check their landing pages and the outcomes that matter to you.<\/p>\n<p>Bring in Search Console when you need evidence about discovered links. Keeping link discovery, measured behavior, and attribution separate makes this a much more useful review and helps you avoid \u201cfixing\u201d a backlink when the real issue is somewhere else.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You can check which websites send you backlink traffic in Google Analytics 4 by opening Reports &gt; Acquisition &gt; Traffic acquisition, filtering for Referral, and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19448,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[277,61,100,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advanced-seo-techniques","category-backlinks","category-blog","category-seo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19447"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24727,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19447\/revisions\/24727"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kwebby.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}